The most eternal part of my work is empowering teachers to reach a point in their profession when they claim with passion, “I can’t imagine teaching without technology.” Transformation … they have changed the way they approach teaching. They deliver curriculum differently and they design a different type of assignment for students. Their curriculum is more interactive and relevant. Their assignments are more authentic, open ended, and closer to the kind of tools students are naturally comfortable with.
The most satisfying part of this work is not necessarily with early adopters, those who readily embrace new ideas, but with the reluctant, the skeptical. These teachers are good, hard working professionals who care deeply for their students, but they vision or confidence, vision for how technology translates into student results or confidence in themselves as users or in the chaos the often borders on a technology-rich lesson.
My homestead is surrounded by rich agricultural lands where rich soil is a pre-requisite to a rich harvest. Fallowed ground must be plowed before seeds are cast; without it, the seeds lay bare for birds to feast on. Likewise, teachers’ must be ready to receive new ideas, to break up the fallow attitudes about how teachers teach and how student learn.
Enter technology. When a teacher approaches a technology-related training, they are at their most pliable state; their ground is broken and they are more ready to embrace new ideas. You don’t have to get them to change, they expect it. They admit they don’t know enough about these new tools and they succumb to disequilibrium; they invite change.
Strike now! Drive home the payoff strategies that have nothing to do with technology but have everything to do with to great teaching. Press first Marzano’s nine strategies, problem-based learning, good questioning techniques, and the like. Then connect technology.
Too often trainers fail to understand this fact and instead they go straight to the “how to use the tool.” Better trainers may throw in a few student samples; but still, the point is missed. These new tools are to be used in new ways. The time to learn this fact is when they are most ready to learn something new.
I have found better success to tell the teachers that traditional teaching methods don’t work using technology. Let’s not pretend they will use the projector differently than an overhead; let’s set the bar high. I bluntly say, “The digital projector can’t be used as a lecturing tool … it can’t. Students should never pen a first draft on paper if they have sufficient computer access to type it in from the start … never.” With these “cultivated” teachers, I talk first about the method, the pedagogy, the expectation of students being in charge and responsible for their own learning, the permission for teachers to release some of their fear and control.
